-
Gatorlicious ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
187 votes total - (1201)
- 10 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SwoNole9 said...
I got it... UF does not want FSU in the SEC; Understand... This thread has made that very clear.
The question is - does the SEC want the Big 12 in the Florida market IF it scoops up FSU and possibly Miami (although I'm less certain on that). And if the SEC does NOT want the Big 12 reaching into the Florida market, what will it do?
Will it (the SEC) concede and add FSU and take one of Clemson or Ga Tech (assuming Ga Tech does not go to Big 10). UF may be against it, but might be in the minority... Just throwing out hypotheticals - but it might be worth noting, b/c that seems somewhat likely.
-
SwoNole9 said...
The question is - does the SEC want the Big 12 in the Florida market IF it scoops up FSU and possibly Miami (although I'm less certain on that). And if the SEC does NOT want the Big 12 reaching into the Florida market, what will it do?
Will it (the SEC) concede and add FSU and take one of Clemson or Ga Tech (assuming Ga Tech does not go to Big 10). UF may be against it, but might be in the minority... Just throwing out hypotheticals - but it might be worth noting, b/c that seems somewhat likely.
-
UFnuts said...
The ACC is currently "in the Florida market" with FSU and Miami. What's the difference if it just switches to the Big 12 being "in the Florida market?" Ho-hum. That's not a reason to invite FSU. If anything it could hurt recruiting as now FSU will be playing road games way out in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Iowa. Think parents will be thrilled about that? At least in the ACC they had games in Georgia, South Carolina, Miami, and North Carolina.
jamielawrence
- 5 stars Rating: 87
110 votes total - (712)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
jamielawrence said...
"Is Florida enough for the SEC to be able to demand a subscriber fee from every cable company in Florida for the eventual SEC network?" It is. So the SEC does't need FSU. The SEC needs to expand into new markets --- NC and VA. If it's smart, FSU will go to the Big 12 now and join forces with MD to litigate te 50m fee they didn't vote for. The ACC's TV rights / network possibilities are poor; the Big 12s are huge in comparison.
This post was edited by Gatoreng on 11/21/2012 at 10:57 AM
-
SwoNole9 said...
I got it... UF does not want FSU in the SEC; Understand... This thread has made that very clear.
The question is - does the SEC want the Big 12 in the Florida market IF it scoops up FSU and possibly Miami (although I'm less certain on that). And if the SEC does NOT want the Big 12 reaching into the Florida market, what will it do?
Will it (the SEC) concede and add FSU and take one of Clemson or Ga Tech (assuming Ga Tech does not go to Big 10). UF may be against it, but might be in the minority... Just throwing out hypotheticals - but it might be worth noting, b/c that seems somewhat likely.
Grantparkgator
- 4 stars Rating: 75
821 votes total - (3835)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Grantparkgator
- 4 stars Rating: 75
821 votes total - (3835)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Grantparkgator said...
Rumors floating that UNC and UVa are heading to the B1G....ACC in talks with Cincy, UConn and L'ville.
Also got this gem from TNole:
two things:
1. Barron is smart. His comments this past summer regarding the ACC was his version of "marking his territory" vis a vis the BOT.
If there is a cabal in the SEC for FSU then we can go to the SEC. I think long term the money is better in the big 12 because Texas, OU and FSu are more marquee names than Bama, Uf, LSU. One issue is if the big 12 can work out a deal for a big 12 network that may dovetail with a Longhorn network or may absorb the Longhorn network. With us, OU and UT it would have more national appeal than the SEC network.
Execs in the SEc will privately admit that making adding MiZZOU was a misatake. As one said to a couple of people I know in the television industry, "The same reasons that make Rutgers and Nebraska better than Mizzou in the big 10 make many teams better than Mizzou for the SEC. Very few sets being turned on by Mizzou and little sEc network potential in Missouri."
when asked "but they do add b-ball", the response was who cares because ky is the only team anyone watches from the SEC and b-ball fans watch other conferences anyway."
The exec "thinks" (has been told ) that most of the SEc wants to add us and VT. However, there appears to be issues that the SEc has its ducks in a row (like the MiZZOU situation) and it is probable they wait too long to add us-as in we pick another conference. "
The butthurt and penis envy is STRONG
Northern Gator
- 5 stars Rating: 92
136 votes total - (436)
- 10 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Northern Gator
- 5 stars Rating: 92
136 votes total - (436)
- 10 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SwoNole9 said...
If UNC and UVA go to the Big 10, then I think FSU will be gone and the ACC will be done as we know it...
It may wait it out a little more to see if the SEC comes calling (which we agree to disagree to an extent), but the BIG 12 will come calling sooner or later...
SEC fans should see who NCSU hires as their new HC... because that university will more than likely be the new school added to the SEC (with Va Tech?)...
-
97G8tr said...
You can't be serious about UNC or UVA going to the Big Ten, can you? Smh. Big Ten has a couple of good institutions but they aren't on the same level academically as far as UNC, Duke, UVA, Wake etc.. As an UVA grad, I'd be shocked if they went to Bug Ten. Too much pride in basketball (Duke, UNC) to play Big Ten IMO.
"England expects that every man will do his duty." - Vice Admiral Horatio Nelson, Royal Navy
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Refresh





With the demise of the ACC...